Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 962, 2022 Dec 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Menstrual cycle length (MCL) and ovarian response varies widely among women of childbearing age. They are provided with anti-Mu¨llerian hormone (AMH) cutoffs for "normal" and "weakened" ovarian responses, which give an early warning of the onset of decreased ovarian response. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in women aged 21 to 35 years with MCLs of 21-35 days receiving in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment at Center for Reproductive Medicine from October 2018 to October 2021. Intergroup variables were balanced using propensity score matching based on age and BMI, and each case patient (patients with MCLs of 21-25 days) was matched with three control patients (patients with MCLs of 26-35 days). A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the AMH cutoff values. RESULTS: We included 135 patients with MCLs of 21-25 days and 405 matched control patients with MCLs of 26-35 days who received IVF treatment. The case group had significantly fewer retrieved oocytes, lower AMH values and higher initial and total Gonadotropin (Gn) levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation than the control group. The ovarian response began to decrease when AMH was < 3.5 ng/ml in the case group and < 2.7 ng/ml in the control group. CONCLUSION: In young women with MCLs of 21-35 days, short MCL was negatively correlated with AMH values and the number of oocytes retrieved. In patients with MCLs of 21-25 days and 26-35 days, the AMH cutoff values corresponding to the onset of decreased ovarian response were 3.5 ng/ml and 2.7 ng/ml, respectively.


Assuntos
Hormônio Antimülleriano , Indução da Ovulação , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Ovário , Fertilização in vitro
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 487, 2021 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229640

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are rising worldwide. One adverse effect of caesarean section reported in some studies is an increased risk of subfertility. Only a few studies have assessed the relationship between the previous mode of delivery and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) reproductive outcomes. In this study, we primarily investigated the impact of a history of caesarean section with or without defects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes compared to a vaginal delivery history. METHODS: This retrospective study included 834 women who had a IVF or ICSI treatment at our centre between 2015 and 2019 with a delivery history. In total, 401 women with a previous vaginal delivery (VD) were assigned to the VD group, and 433 women with a history of delivery by caesarean section were included, among whom 359 had a caesarean scar (CS) without a defect and were assigned to the CS group and 74 had a caesarean section defect (CSD) and were assigned to the CSD group. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were compared and analysed. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between clinical outcomes and different delivery modes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, mean implantation rate or abnormal pregnancy rate between the CS and VD groups However, the live birth rate and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.6 vs 36.4%, adjusted OR 0.50 [0.27-0.9]; 0.25 ± 0.39 vs 0.35 ± 0.41, adjusted OR 0.90 [0.81-0.99]). Among women aged ≤ 35 years, the subgroup analyses showed that the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were all significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.4 vs 45.8%, adjusted OR 0.35[0.15 ~ 0.85]; 38.1 vs 59.8%, adjusted OR 0.52[0.24-0.82]; 31.0 vs 55.6%, adjusted OR 0.43[0.19-0.92]; 0.27 ± 0.43 vs 0.43 ± 0.43, adjusted OR 0.85[0.43 ± 0.43]). For women older than 35 years, there was no statistically significant difference in any pregnancy outcome among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the existence of a CS without a defect does not decrease the live birth rate after IVF or ICSI compared with a previous VD. However, the presence of a CSD in women, especially young women (age ≤ 35 years), significantly impaired the chances of subsequent pregnancy.


Assuntos
Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Transferência Embrionária/estatística & dados numéricos , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Implantação do Embrião , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Vagina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...